Compare

apikumo vs Insomnia

Insomnia is a local-first, open-source client. apikumo is a hosted workspace that publishes what you test.

Insomnia (by Kong) is an Apache-2.0 open-source desktop client with local, Git, and cloud storage, and a broad protocol list including gRPC and SSE. apikumo is browser-based and hosted: nothing to install, and the collection you test becomes a docs site, a schema-based mock server, and a read-only MCP endpoint. Pick Insomnia for local-first work and protocol breadth; pick apikumo when publishing is part of the job.

What sets apikumo apart

Publishing is built in

Publish a collection to its own subdomain with search, live try-it, a changelog, and an AI assistant for readers.

Your API as an MCP server

Every published collection is a read-only MCP server. Insomnia’s MCP support is a client, for calling other MCP servers.

Nothing to install

apikumo runs in the browser and syncs everywhere you sign in. Insomnia is a desktop app for Mac, Windows, and Linux, with local, Git, and cloud storage.

Feature comparison

FeatureapikumoInsomnia
API-client workspace
Import Insomnia exportsv4 JSON
Open sourceApache-2.0
Local-only / offline storageCloud syncScratch Pad, Local Vault, Git Sync
Collection runner / test suitesUnlimited runs
Mock serversSchema-based1,000 req/mo on Free
CLI for CIInso CLI
Hosted docs siteNot listed on pricing page
MCPServer per published collectionMCP client
Live protocolsHTTP (incl. GraphQL bodies)REST, GraphQL, WebSockets, SSE, gRPC
PricingFree: up to 3 members · Team $8/seat/moFree: Git Sync for 3 users · Pro $12/user/mo3
  1. 1Insomnia source, license, and desktop platforms: github.com/Kong/insomnia (Apache-2.0).
  2. 2Insomnia storage: Scratch Pad works without logging in and keeps data local; Local Vault and Git Sync need a login (developer.konghq.com/insomnia/storage).
  3. 3Insomnia pricing: Essentials (Free), Pro $12/user/month, Enterprise $45/user/month; Free includes Git Sync projects for up to 3 users (insomnia.rest/pricing).

Comparison verified Sep 2026 · competitor features and pricing change

Which one should you pick?

Pick apikumo if…

  • You want to publish docs, mocks, and an MCP endpoint from the collection you test, with no extra tooling.
  • Your team works in the browser and does not want to install or update a desktop app.
  • You want readers of your docs to get an AI assistant grounded in your endpoints.

Pick Insomnia if…

  • You need to work offline, or keep request data local and out of any cloud.
  • You want an open-source client you can audit and self-build.
  • You test gRPC, SSE, or live WebSocket traffic.
  • Your workflow is Git-first, with collections versioned next to your code.

Moving from Insomnia

  1. 1Export your collection from Insomnia. apikumo’s importer reads Insomnia v4 JSON exports; if your export is in another format, import your OpenAPI spec instead.
  2. 2Import it into an apikumo workspace — requests, folders, and environments come across.
  3. 3Send a handful of requests to confirm auth and variables resolve.
  4. 4Turn your regression checks into a test suite and run it in CI with the apikumo CLI.
  5. 5Publish the collection for a docs site, mocks, and a read-only MCP endpoint.

Where apikumo falls short

  • apikumo runs in the browser and needs a sign-in; there is no offline or local-only mode, and no desktop app yet.
  • The platform is not open source.
  • WebSocket support is documentation only today: you can describe a socket’s handshake URL, params, headers, and auth, but not open a live connection and exchange messages.
  • No gRPC, MQTT, or Socket.IO clients.

Learn more

Publish what you already test

Import your Insomnia collection, then ship docs, mocks, and an MCP endpoint from it.

No card required · Sign in with Google, GitHub, or Discord